<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1330 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336685</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to make a predeposit and stayed the balance tax, interest, and penalties pending appeal resolution. The issue of service tax liability for works contracts, compliance with statutory provisions, and the applicability of service tax on specific projects were thoroughly examined, highlighting the importance of proper documentation and compliance with tax regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1330 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336685</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to make a predeposit and stayed the balance tax, interest, and penalties pending appeal resolution. The issue of service tax liability for works contracts, compliance with statutory provisions, and the applicability of service tax on specific projects were thoroughly examined, highlighting the importance of proper documentation and compliance with tax regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>