<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1328 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336683</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the refund application based on the applicability of Board Circular No. 108/02/2009 ST. The matter was remanded for fresh examination. The issue of the refund being time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act was not explicitly addressed in the Tribunal&#039;s order but may be re-evaluated during the fresh examination by the original authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 18:23:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1328 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336683</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the refund application based on the applicability of Board Circular No. 108/02/2009 ST. The matter was remanded for fresh examination. The issue of the refund being time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act was not explicitly addressed in the Tribunal&#039;s order but may be re-evaluated during the fresh examination by the original authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>