<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1322 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336677</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the valuation of &#039;grindings&#039; issue for fresh hearing, overturning a demand for short-paid amount and wrongly availed MODVAT credit, finding the debit notes irrelevant to &#039;grindings&#039;. It allowed MODVAT credit on additional duty paid on imports, following precedents. The duty liability for missing stock at the factory premises was upheld but penalties were waived due to minimal differential duty, limiting the liability to &amp;amp;8377; 59,056 with interest. The judgment provided detailed analysis and legal references, clarifying the issues comprehensively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1322 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336677</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the valuation of &#039;grindings&#039; issue for fresh hearing, overturning a demand for short-paid amount and wrongly availed MODVAT credit, finding the debit notes irrelevant to &#039;grindings&#039;. It allowed MODVAT credit on additional duty paid on imports, following precedents. The duty liability for missing stock at the factory premises was upheld but penalties were waived due to minimal differential duty, limiting the liability to &amp;amp;8377; 59,056 with interest. The judgment provided detailed analysis and legal references, clarifying the issues comprehensively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>