<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (5) TMI 264 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189093</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the detention order passed by the District Magistrate under the National Security Act, 1980, finding it valid and in compliance with constitutional safeguards under Article 22(5). The Court held that the detaining authority had adequately detailed grounds for detention and had properly communicated them to the detenu. Additionally, the Court ruled that the Central Government was not obligated to consider a subsequent representation for revocation as it was not a statutory representation under section 14 of the Act. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and maintaining the detention order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 17:58:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (5) TMI 264 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189093</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the detention order passed by the District Magistrate under the National Security Act, 1980, finding it valid and in compliance with constitutional safeguards under Article 22(5). The Court held that the detaining authority had adequately detailed grounds for detention and had properly communicated them to the detenu. Additionally, the Court ruled that the Central Government was not obligated to consider a subsequent representation for revocation as it was not a statutory representation under section 14 of the Act. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and maintaining the detention order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>