https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189093 Article 22(5) requires communication of detention grounds and a real opportunity to make a representation, and that safeguard was complied with here because the detenu's representation was forwarded and considered by the State Government and the Central Government. Section 14 of the National Security Act confers a statutory power of revocation, but it does not create a separate right to repeated consideration of successive revocation requests on the same grounds. As the original representation had already been examined by the competent authorities, the Central Government was not obliged to consider a later representation addressed through counsel to the Prime Minister. Continued detention was therefore not rendered illegal. en-us Fri, 04 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Dec 2016 17:58:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189093 Article 22(5) requires communication of detention grounds and a real opportunity to make a representation, and that safeguard was complied with here because the detenu's representation was forwarded and considered by the State Government and the Central Government. Section 14 of the National Security Act confers a statutory power of revocation, but it does not create a separate right to repeated consideration of successive revocation requests on the same grounds. As the original representation had already been examined by the competent authorities, the Central Government was not obliged to consider a later representation addressed through counsel to the Prime Minister. Continued detention was therefore not rendered illegal. Case-Laws FEMA Fri, 04 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189093