https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189092 The Supreme Court ruled that the High Court erred in using its jurisdiction under Article 226 to grant relief for a breach of contract in a case involving PVC pipe supply. Emphasizing that writs are not suitable for enforcing contractual obligations, the Court held that such disputes should be resolved through evidence in a civil suit. The Court allowed the appeal, overturned the High Court's decision directing payment with interest, and advised the respondent to pursue alternative remedies for the breach of contract issue. en-us Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Dec 2016 17:45:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189092 The Supreme Court ruled that the High Court erred in using its jurisdiction under Article 226 to grant relief for a breach of contract in a case involving PVC pipe supply. Emphasizing that writs are not suitable for enforcing contractual obligations, the Court held that such disputes should be resolved through evidence in a civil suit. The Court allowed the appeal, overturned the High Court's decision directing payment with interest, and advised the respondent to pursue alternative remedies for the breach of contract issue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189092