<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (11) TMI 393 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189090</link>
    <description>Preventive detention is not invalidated merely by delay in passing the order if the delay is satisfactorily explained and the live link with prejudicial activity remains intact. The decision also states that non-placement of some additional documents does not vitiate detention where relevant material otherwise supports the detaining authority&#039;s subjective satisfaction, and courts will not reappreciate the sufficiency of that material. A successive representation repeating earlier grounds does not require separate fresh consideration unless new relevant facts arise, and detention can be sustained where the record discloses ample material showing prejudice to the maintenance of supplies of an essential commodity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 17:30:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (11) TMI 393 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189090</link>
      <description>Preventive detention is not invalidated merely by delay in passing the order if the delay is satisfactorily explained and the live link with prejudicial activity remains intact. The decision also states that non-placement of some additional documents does not vitiate detention where relevant material otherwise supports the detaining authority&#039;s subjective satisfaction, and courts will not reappreciate the sufficiency of that material. A successive representation repeating earlier grounds does not require separate fresh consideration unless new relevant facts arise, and detention can be sustained where the record discloses ample material showing prejudice to the maintenance of supplies of an essential commodity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>