https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189090 The court dismissed the writ petition and special leave application, finding no merit in quashing the detention order. The court rejected arguments regarding delay in passing the detention order, diversion of levy cement, delay in disposing of representations, non-placement of relevant facts before the detaining authority, and the detention order being based on a solitary incident that was not pressed during arguments. The court emphasized the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction and upheld the detention order. en-us Wed, 11 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Dec 2016 17:30:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189090 The court dismissed the writ petition and special leave application, finding no merit in quashing the detention order. The court rejected arguments regarding delay in passing the detention order, diversion of levy cement, delay in disposing of representations, non-placement of relevant facts before the detaining authority, and the detention order being based on a solitary incident that was not pressed during arguments. The court emphasized the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction and upheld the detention order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189090