<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (3) TMI 353 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189084</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court quashed a detention order under the National Security Act, 1980, due to the failure to forward the detenu&#039;s representation to the Central Government. Despite the detenu providing copies to the State Government, the representation was not forwarded to the Central Government as required by law. The Court emphasized the detenu&#039;s right to make representations to both State and Central Governments and held that the Superintendent Jail had a legal obligation to ensure the representation reached the Central Government. Consequently, the detention order was quashed, highlighting the importance of fulfilling the detenu&#039;s right to make effective representations in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 16:40:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (3) TMI 353 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189084</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court quashed a detention order under the National Security Act, 1980, due to the failure to forward the detenu&#039;s representation to the Central Government. Despite the detenu providing copies to the State Government, the representation was not forwarded to the Central Government as required by law. The Court emphasized the detenu&#039;s right to make representations to both State and Central Governments and held that the Superintendent Jail had a legal obligation to ensure the representation reached the Central Government. Consequently, the detention order was quashed, highlighting the importance of fulfilling the detenu&#039;s right to make effective representations in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>