<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1302 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336657</link>
    <description>A company petition for winding up may be verified by a duly authorised person where leave is granted for sufficient reason, and a board-backed power of attorney executed through an authorised officer can satisfy that requirement. A power of attorney executed and notarised in China attracted the presumption under Section 85 of the Indian Evidence Act, while Section 57 required judicial notice of the notary&#039;s seal. Section 14 of the Notaries Act, 1952 did not limit or override those Evidence Act provisions, so a Central Government notification was not necessary for reliance on the foreign notarisation. The objection to maintainability therefore failed, and the petition was admitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 15:54:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1302 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336657</link>
      <description>A company petition for winding up may be verified by a duly authorised person where leave is granted for sufficient reason, and a board-backed power of attorney executed through an authorised officer can satisfy that requirement. A power of attorney executed and notarised in China attracted the presumption under Section 85 of the Indian Evidence Act, while Section 57 required judicial notice of the notary&#039;s seal. Section 14 of the Notaries Act, 1952 did not limit or override those Evidence Act provisions, so a Central Government notification was not necessary for reliance on the foreign notarisation. The objection to maintainability therefore failed, and the petition was admitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>