<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1243 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189078</link>
    <description>The Court rejected the challenge to the Detention Notice citing ongoing investigation for Safeguard Duty evasion. It allowed testing of goods and directed provisional release for some cleared entries. The Court clarified that a writ of certiorari could not be issued against the Detention Notice, permitting the Department to continue its investigation under the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 15:43:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1243 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189078</link>
      <description>The Court rejected the challenge to the Detention Notice citing ongoing investigation for Safeguard Duty evasion. It allowed testing of goods and directed provisional release for some cleared entries. The Court clarified that a writ of certiorari could not be issued against the Detention Notice, permitting the Department to continue its investigation under the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>