https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189080 The High Court declined to interfere in a matter where a substantive remedy was pending before the CIT(Appeals). The Court emphasized the importance of exhausting alternative remedies before seeking intervention under constitutional provisions. As the petitioner could seek interim relief and present contentions in the pending appeal, the Court found interference under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India unjustified. The Court disposed of the petition, recognizing the petitioner's right to pursue the alternate remedy and addressing concerns regarding interim protection. en-us Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Dec 2016 15:43:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189080 The High Court declined to interfere in a matter where a substantive remedy was pending before the CIT(Appeals). The Court emphasized the importance of exhausting alternative remedies before seeking intervention under constitutional provisions. As the petitioner could seek interim relief and present contentions in the pending appeal, the Court found interference under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India unjustified. The Court disposed of the petition, recognizing the petitioner's right to pursue the alternate remedy and addressing concerns regarding interim protection. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189080