<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1300 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336655</link>
    <description>Goods intercepted in transport were found, prima facie, to have been moved without the mandatory Form-21 under the U.P. VAT regime, and the appellate order releasing them without security was questioned for not addressing the seizure findings. The court noted that the order appeared to rely mainly on denial of cross-examination of the driver, while the statutory transport requirement and seizure material were left unconsidered. At the interim stage, the impugned order was stayed, and the revision was admitted on questions of law for final disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 15:43:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1300 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336655</link>
      <description>Goods intercepted in transport were found, prima facie, to have been moved without the mandatory Form-21 under the U.P. VAT regime, and the appellate order releasing them without security was questioned for not addressing the seizure findings. The court noted that the order appeared to rely mainly on denial of cross-examination of the driver, while the statutory transport requirement and seizure material were left unconsidered. At the interim stage, the impugned order was stayed, and the revision was admitted on questions of law for final disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>