https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189074 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for further examination of documentary proof provided by M/s Constro Enterprises regarding tax payments from October 2010 to March 2012. The demand was to be limited to amounts not covered by tax payments through deposit, CENVAT credit utilization, or VCES payments, emphasizing the necessity of verifying actual tax payments and restricting CENVAT credit utilization to actual tax dues for a specific period. The appeal was disposed of with instructions for detailed scrutiny of deposits and credit utilization for the appellant's construction services. en-us Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Feb 2017 10:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189074 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for further examination of documentary proof provided by M/s Constro Enterprises regarding tax payments from October 2010 to March 2012. The demand was to be limited to amounts not covered by tax payments through deposit, CENVAT credit utilization, or VCES payments, emphasizing the necessity of verifying actual tax payments and restricting CENVAT credit utilization to actual tax dues for a specific period. The appeal was disposed of with instructions for detailed scrutiny of deposits and credit utilization for the appellant's construction services. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189074