<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1194 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189074</link>
    <description>Under the voluntary compliance scheme, the bar on utilisation of CENVAT credit applied only to unpaid tax dues, and liability had to be determined on actual proof of payment rather than on an incomplete return. Documentary records such as registers and worksheets had to be examined to verify which part of the service tax liability was already discharged by cash or credit and which part, if any, remained unpaid. The original demand based on a presumption from a nil return could not be sustained, and the matter was remanded for fresh examination on the evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2017 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1194 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189074</link>
      <description>Under the voluntary compliance scheme, the bar on utilisation of CENVAT credit applied only to unpaid tax dues, and liability had to be determined on actual proof of payment rather than on an incomplete return. Documentary records such as registers and worksheets had to be examined to verify which part of the service tax liability was already discharged by cash or credit and which part, if any, remained unpaid. The original demand based on a presumption from a nil return could not be sustained, and the matter was remanded for fresh examination on the evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>