<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 525 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189061</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that transferred Lower Division Clerks (LDCs) on their own request must forego seniority till the date of transfer and be placed below the junior-most employee in the new unit. The Court emphasized that the seniority of transferred LDCs should be determined from the date of joining the new district as per statutory rules, superseding previous executive instructions. The High Court&#039;s direction for prospective application of rules was deemed incorrect, and the revised seniority lists counting from the date of joining the new district were upheld. The appeals were allowed, and the transferred LDCs&#039; writ petitions were dismissed without consequential recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 13:20:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 525 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189061</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that transferred Lower Division Clerks (LDCs) on their own request must forego seniority till the date of transfer and be placed below the junior-most employee in the new unit. The Court emphasized that the seniority of transferred LDCs should be determined from the date of joining the new district as per statutory rules, superseding previous executive instructions. The High Court&#039;s direction for prospective application of rules was deemed incorrect, and the revised seniority lists counting from the date of joining the new district were upheld. The appeals were allowed, and the transferred LDCs&#039; writ petitions were dismissed without consequential recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>