<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 525 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189061</link>
    <description>A government servant transferred on own request to another district in the same department loses prior seniority and is ranked from the date of joining the new unit, even where the feeder post is district-wise and the promotional post is state-wise. The proviso to Rule 27(a) of the Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1958 governed seniority and displaced any inconsistent executive instruction. The court also held that the rule could not be restricted to prospective operation merely to preserve an earlier seniority list, because a judicial direction cannot override the express statutory consequence of own-request transfer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 13:20:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 525 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189061</link>
      <description>A government servant transferred on own request to another district in the same department loses prior seniority and is ranked from the date of joining the new unit, even where the feeder post is district-wise and the promotional post is state-wise. The proviso to Rule 27(a) of the Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1958 governed seniority and displaced any inconsistent executive instruction. The court also held that the rule could not be restricted to prospective operation merely to preserve an earlier seniority list, because a judicial direction cannot override the express statutory consequence of own-request transfer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>