https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189056 The court upheld the Authority's decision to condone the delay in filing applications for minimum wages and other amounts payable under the Minimum Wages Act. It emphasized the need for judicious exercise of discretion by the Authority and limited judicial review under Article 227 of the Constitution to instances of capricious or ultra vires decisions. The court found that the delay in this case was not due to negligence but stemmed from a mistaken belief in government intervention. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed as there was no grave miscarriage of justice, highlighting the importance of respecting administrative discretion and the boundaries of judicial review. en-us Thu, 20 Apr 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Dec 2016 10:57:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189056 The court upheld the Authority's decision to condone the delay in filing applications for minimum wages and other amounts payable under the Minimum Wages Act. It emphasized the need for judicious exercise of discretion by the Authority and limited judicial review under Article 227 of the Constitution to instances of capricious or ultra vires decisions. The court found that the delay in this case was not due to negligence but stemmed from a mistaken belief in government intervention. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed as there was no grave miscarriage of justice, highlighting the importance of respecting administrative discretion and the boundaries of judicial review. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Apr 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189056