https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189056 "Sufficient cause" under the proviso to section 20(2) of the Minimum Wages Act is to be construed liberally, and delay may be admitted where the applicant shows bona fide pursuit of the grievance and a mistaken but honest belief that relief would come through official intervention. On the stated facts, the Authority validly exercised discretion to condone the delay only in part, limiting relief to claims arising after 1 January 1961. Supervisory intervention under Article 227 is confined to keeping the tribunal within jurisdiction and is not available merely because another view is possible; no arbitrariness, perversity, excess of jurisdiction, or grave miscarriage of justice was shown, so interference was refused. en-us Thu, 20 Apr 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Dec 2016 10:57:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189056 "Sufficient cause" under the proviso to section 20(2) of the Minimum Wages Act is to be construed liberally, and delay may be admitted where the applicant shows bona fide pursuit of the grievance and a mistaken but honest belief that relief would come through official intervention. On the stated facts, the Authority validly exercised discretion to condone the delay only in part, limiting relief to claims arising after 1 January 1961. Supervisory intervention under Article 227 is confined to keeping the tribunal within jurisdiction and is not available merely because another view is possible; no arbitrariness, perversity, excess of jurisdiction, or grave miscarriage of justice was shown, so interference was refused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Apr 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189056