<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1192 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189053</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the cancellation of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2002-03. The appellant&#039;s treatment of interest income, differing from the Assessing Officer&#039;s approach, was deemed valid, and not grounds for penalty. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of a bonafide explanation and precedent in tax matters, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 10:28:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1192 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189053</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the cancellation of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2002-03. The appellant&#039;s treatment of interest income, differing from the Assessing Officer&#039;s approach, was deemed valid, and not grounds for penalty. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of a bonafide explanation and precedent in tax matters, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>