<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (8) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6216</link>
    <description>An amount credited to the profit and loss account as unpaid bonus was not taxable under section 10(2A) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 because the foundational condition of a prior allowance or deduction in respect of that trading liability was not proved. The provision applies only where an earlier assessment has allowed a deduction for a loss, expenditure, or trading liability, and the assessee later receives a remission or cessation benefit. On the record, there was no showing that the bonus liability had been specifically allowed as a deduction in the earlier year, so the statutory test failed. The referred question was answered in the negative, in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (8) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6216</link>
      <description>An amount credited to the profit and loss account as unpaid bonus was not taxable under section 10(2A) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 because the foundational condition of a prior allowance or deduction in respect of that trading liability was not proved. The provision applies only where an earlier assessment has allowed a deduction for a loss, expenditure, or trading liability, and the assessee later receives a remission or cessation benefit. On the record, there was no showing that the bonus liability had been specifically allowed as a deduction in the earlier year, so the statutory test failed. The referred question was answered in the negative, in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>