<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 645 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189044</link>
    <description>A university could not establish or operate a distance-education study centre outside the territorial limits fixed by its governing statute. The statutory scheme confined the university&#039;s powers to the districts listed in the Schedule, and ordinance-making power could not override that restriction. Because a study centre involves local academic activity, supervision, teaching, practical work and supporting facilities, it is materially different from a simple correspondence arrangement. Regulations made by the University Grants Commission could not enlarge the university&#039;s statutory jurisdiction, as subordinate legislation must conform to the parent Act; any wider distance-education reach would require amendment of the Act itself.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 14:52:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 645 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189044</link>
      <description>A university could not establish or operate a distance-education study centre outside the territorial limits fixed by its governing statute. The statutory scheme confined the university&#039;s powers to the districts listed in the Schedule, and ordinance-making power could not override that restriction. Because a study centre involves local academic activity, supervision, teaching, practical work and supporting facilities, it is materially different from a simple correspondence arrangement. Regulations made by the University Grants Commission could not enlarge the university&#039;s statutory jurisdiction, as subordinate legislation must conform to the parent Act; any wider distance-education reach would require amendment of the Act itself.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>