<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1290 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336645</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the penalty was unjustified as the assessee had provided a satisfactory explanation for the unaccounted receipts. Therefore, the order confirming the penalty was set aside, and the penalty amount was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1290 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336645</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the penalty was unjustified as the assessee had provided a satisfactory explanation for the unaccounted receipts. Therefore, the order confirming the penalty was set aside, and the penalty amount was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>