<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1285 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336640</link>
    <description>The court held that the reopening of the assessment for AY 2010-11 beyond four years was not justified as the petitioner had disclosed all necessary facts during the original assessment. The impugned notice and reassessment proceedings under Section 147 were quashed and set aside. The petition was allowed, and the rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 14:18:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1285 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336640</link>
      <description>The court held that the reopening of the assessment for AY 2010-11 beyond four years was not justified as the petitioner had disclosed all necessary facts during the original assessment. The impugned notice and reassessment proceedings under Section 147 were quashed and set aside. The petition was allowed, and the rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>