<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1280 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336635</link>
    <description>The court upheld the legality of the Commissioner&#039;s revisional order, finding it in line with the Income Tax Act provisions. The petitioner&#039;s challenge to the Departmental Valuation Officer&#039;s report was directed to pursue the appellate remedy. The court allowed the petitioner to raise all available grounds in the appeal against the assessment order. Both petitions were disposed of, and the rule was discharged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1280 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336635</link>
      <description>The court upheld the legality of the Commissioner&#039;s revisional order, finding it in line with the Income Tax Act provisions. The petitioner&#039;s challenge to the Departmental Valuation Officer&#039;s report was directed to pursue the appellate remedy. The court allowed the petitioner to raise all available grounds in the appeal against the assessment order. Both petitions were disposed of, and the rule was discharged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>