https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189038 The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's decision in a case involving a dispute over the partition and formation of a partnership business between two brothers. The Court held that the partition was unfair and prejudicial to the minor sons of one of the brothers, emphasizing that a partition could be reopened if found to be unfair or prejudicial to the minor's interest, even without fraud or misrepresentation. The judgment underscored the significance of fairness in family partitions and upheld the rights of minor coparceners to challenge unequal divisions, dismissing the appeal and citing relevant legal precedents. en-us Thu, 12 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Dec 2016 11:21:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189038 The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's decision in a case involving a dispute over the partition and formation of a partnership business between two brothers. The Court held that the partition was unfair and prejudicial to the minor sons of one of the brothers, emphasizing that a partition could be reopened if found to be unfair or prejudicial to the minor's interest, even without fraud or misrepresentation. The judgment underscored the significance of fairness in family partitions and upheld the rights of minor coparceners to challenge unequal divisions, dismissing the appeal and citing relevant legal precedents. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189038