<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (11) TMI 90 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189036</link>
    <description>An application to refer questions of law must arise from the Tribunal&#039;s final order after hearing both parties; interlocutory orders made while an appeal remains pending and seeking further report or enquiry do not qualify as orders giving rise to a reference. Consequently, permitting references from interlocutory rulings would frustrate the legislative policy favouring finality. Because the reference application related only to the Tribunal&#039;s interlocutory order dated 15 December 1955 and the final disposal occurred later, the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to state a case on that interlocutory order and the reference could not be validly entertained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 10:45:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (11) TMI 90 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189036</link>
      <description>An application to refer questions of law must arise from the Tribunal&#039;s final order after hearing both parties; interlocutory orders made while an appeal remains pending and seeking further report or enquiry do not qualify as orders giving rise to a reference. Consequently, permitting references from interlocutory rulings would frustrate the legislative policy favouring finality. Because the reference application related only to the Tribunal&#039;s interlocutory order dated 15 December 1955 and the final disposal occurred later, the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to state a case on that interlocutory order and the reference could not be validly entertained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>