<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1280 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189026</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals regarding borrowed service charges, concluding that they are not taxable as &#039;fees for technical services&#039; under the India-Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. The decision was based on precedents from previous cases and the resolution of similar issues under the Mutual Agreement Procedure, leading to relief for the assessee due to the department&#039;s withdrawal of appeals before the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 10:31:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1280 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189026</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals regarding borrowed service charges, concluding that they are not taxable as &#039;fees for technical services&#039; under the India-Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. The decision was based on precedents from previous cases and the resolution of similar issues under the Mutual Agreement Procedure, leading to relief for the assessee due to the department&#039;s withdrawal of appeals before the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>