<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1625 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189029</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to estimate business income at an 8% net profit rate, rejecting AO&#039;s additions on advances, sales, and expenses under section 40(a)(ia). The Tribunal emphasized that the net profit rate eliminated the need for separate disallowances of expenses, as the profit element was already considered. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 10:31:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1625 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189029</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to estimate business income at an 8% net profit rate, rejecting AO&#039;s additions on advances, sales, and expenses under section 40(a)(ia). The Tribunal emphasized that the net profit rate eliminated the need for separate disallowances of expenses, as the profit element was already considered. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>