<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1299 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189031</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing due to the assessee&#039;s critical illness, and admitting the appeal. Regarding the treatment of agricultural income, the Tribunal accepted the ownership of the land in Punjab and acknowledged the agricultural practices and fertility of the land. Estimating the income at Rs. 10 lakh for the year, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, treating the balance as income from other sources.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 10:31:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1299 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189031</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing due to the assessee&#039;s critical illness, and admitting the appeal. Regarding the treatment of agricultural income, the Tribunal accepted the ownership of the land in Punjab and acknowledged the agricultural practices and fertility of the land. Estimating the income at Rs. 10 lakh for the year, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, treating the balance as income from other sources.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>