<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1270 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336625</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal. The decision was based on the interpretation of the exemption notification, compliance with the end-use condition, and the application of the Customs Rules, 1996. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of a liberal approach in customs and excise matters, ultimately finding in favor of the appellant due to fulfillment of conditions and procedural irregularities in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1270 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336625</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal. The decision was based on the interpretation of the exemption notification, compliance with the end-use condition, and the application of the Customs Rules, 1996. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of a liberal approach in customs and excise matters, ultimately finding in favor of the appellant due to fulfillment of conditions and procedural irregularities in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>