<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1269 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336624</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is mandatory only after the statutory ingredients of fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts, or intent to evade duty are established. The High Court noted that later Supreme Court authority did not dispense with those preconditions; it only confirmed that once they are proved, the authority has no discretion in the penalty quantum. Because the tribunal found those statutory conditions, and the related interest consequence, were not made out on the facts, the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the assessee&#039;s relief was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 16:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1269 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336624</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is mandatory only after the statutory ingredients of fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts, or intent to evade duty are established. The High Court noted that later Supreme Court authority did not dispense with those preconditions; it only confirmed that once they are proved, the authority has no discretion in the penalty quantum. Because the tribunal found those statutory conditions, and the related interest consequence, were not made out on the facts, the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the assessee&#039;s relief was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>