https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336616 Synthetic web equipment was reclassified in part under the Central Excise Tariff: items such as pack with aluminium frame, haversack, pouches ammunition and frog bayonet were held to fall under sub-heading 4202, while belt waist was classified under sub-heading 63.07. The earlier classification could not be sustained in full on that basis. The penalties imposed on both appellants were found unjustified and were set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh quantification of duty on the revised classification after giving the appellants an opportunity of hearing. en-us Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Dec 2016 09:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336616 Synthetic web equipment was reclassified in part under the Central Excise Tariff: items such as pack with aluminium frame, haversack, pouches ammunition and frog bayonet were held to fall under sub-heading 4202, while belt waist was classified under sub-heading 63.07. The earlier classification could not be sustained in full on that basis. The penalties imposed on both appellants were found unjustified and were set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh quantification of duty on the revised classification after giving the appellants an opportunity of hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336616