<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1247 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336602</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions on all three issues, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It ruled that the interest income earned during the pre-operative period should be set off against related expenses if linked to the business setup. Additionally, it held that Section 14A disallowance does not apply to investments yielding taxable capital gains.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2016 19:31:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1247 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336602</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions on all three issues, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It ruled that the interest income earned during the pre-operative period should be set off against related expenses if linked to the business setup. Additionally, it held that Section 14A disallowance does not apply to investments yielding taxable capital gains.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>