<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1246 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336601</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing reassessment of the treatment of income as business income instead of Capital Gains and the disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT emphasized the necessity of establishing a direct relationship between expenditure and exempt income for disallowance purposes, stressing the importance of thorough analysis and justification by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1246 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336601</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing reassessment of the treatment of income as business income instead of Capital Gains and the disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT emphasized the necessity of establishing a direct relationship between expenditure and exempt income for disallowance purposes, stressing the importance of thorough analysis and justification by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>