https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189022 The disputes were held to be essentially questions of fact already adjudicated by the Tribunal, and the Supreme Court declined interference because no jurisdictional error, perversity, or other exceptional circumstance was shown. As appellate review does not permit reappraisal or reweighing of evidence on pure factual findings, the Tribunal's conclusions were left undisturbed and the appeals were dismissed. en-us Tue, 23 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Dec 2016 12:28:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189022 The disputes were held to be essentially questions of fact already adjudicated by the Tribunal, and the Supreme Court declined interference because no jurisdictional error, perversity, or other exceptional circumstance was shown. As appellate review does not permit reappraisal or reweighing of evidence on pure factual findings, the Tribunal's conclusions were left undisturbed and the appeals were dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 23 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189022