<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1244 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336599</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 2,82,000 under Section 69C, partially allowing the appeals. The decision was based on insufficient evidence supporting the addition, in line with a previous Tribunal ruling. The appeals were granted, with the order issued on 27th Oct, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2016 07:56:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1244 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336599</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 2,82,000 under Section 69C, partially allowing the appeals. The decision was based on insufficient evidence supporting the addition, in line with a previous Tribunal ruling. The appeals were granted, with the order issued on 27th Oct, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>