<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (2) TMI 88 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6196</link>
    <description>The court ruled that the payments to the assessee under trust deeds did not qualify as annuities under the Wealth-tax Act, as they were shares of income, not fixed sums. Consequently, these payments were included in the assessee&#039;s net wealth. However, the court exempted the value of jewellery owned by the assessee from wealth tax under section 5(1)(viii) as it was intended for personal use. The appeals were dismissed, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (2) TMI 88 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6196</link>
      <description>The court ruled that the payments to the assessee under trust deeds did not qualify as annuities under the Wealth-tax Act, as they were shares of income, not fixed sums. Consequently, these payments were included in the assessee&#039;s net wealth. However, the court exempted the value of jewellery owned by the assessee from wealth tax under section 5(1)(viii) as it was intended for personal use. The appeals were dismissed, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>