<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1236 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336591</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, directing the deletion of penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c). It was held that the penalty was not justified as no specific defect or incriminating material was found during the search, and the disclosure was voluntary. The Tribunal also ruled that penalties for searches conducted after 1.6.2007 should be levied under section 271AAA, not under section 271(1)(c).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2016 07:55:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1236 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336591</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, directing the deletion of penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c). It was held that the penalty was not justified as no specific defect or incriminating material was found during the search, and the disclosure was voluntary. The Tribunal also ruled that penalties for searches conducted after 1.6.2007 should be levied under section 271AAA, not under section 271(1)(c).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>