<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1227 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336582</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed by way of remand, directing the appellants to produce necessary evidence to support their claim for CENVAT Credit on Garden Maintenance Service, Car Rental Service, and Canteen Service. The impugned orders were set aside, emphasizing the need for verification of the facts regarding the eligibility of credit for the disputed services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2016 07:54:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1227 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336582</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed by way of remand, directing the appellants to produce necessary evidence to support their claim for CENVAT Credit on Garden Maintenance Service, Car Rental Service, and Canteen Service. The impugned orders were set aside, emphasizing the need for verification of the facts regarding the eligibility of credit for the disputed services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>