<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1219 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336574</link>
    <description>The case centered on the eligibility of assessees for concessional and &#039;nil&#039; duty rates under notification no. 14/2002-CE. The issue arose regarding the interpretation of conditions for exemption under the notification. The Supreme Court clarified the conditions for availing exemptions and held that duty shall be deemed paid even without evidence of payment. Discrepancies in demands were addressed, with different Commissioners making varied decisions based on duty discharge on intermediates/inputs. The judgment referenced a Larger Bench decision approved by the Supreme Court, affirming the assessees&#039; entitlement to the exemption. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeals were rejected, and the appeal of M/s Hindoostan Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1219 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336574</link>
      <description>The case centered on the eligibility of assessees for concessional and &#039;nil&#039; duty rates under notification no. 14/2002-CE. The issue arose regarding the interpretation of conditions for exemption under the notification. The Supreme Court clarified the conditions for availing exemptions and held that duty shall be deemed paid even without evidence of payment. Discrepancies in demands were addressed, with different Commissioners making varied decisions based on duty discharge on intermediates/inputs. The judgment referenced a Larger Bench decision approved by the Supreme Court, affirming the assessees&#039; entitlement to the exemption. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeals were rejected, and the appeal of M/s Hindoostan Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>