https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336573 The appeal was partially allowed, with the case remanded to the Adjudicating authority for reconsideration of the eligibility of Cenvat Credit on disputed items. The imposition of a penalty under Rule 15(1) was deemed unjustified due to interpretational disputes. The appellant's arguments supported by a Chartered Engineer's certificate and previous case law played a crucial role in the decision. en-us Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Dec 2016 07:54:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336573 The appeal was partially allowed, with the case remanded to the Adjudicating authority for reconsideration of the eligibility of Cenvat Credit on disputed items. The imposition of a penalty under Rule 15(1) was deemed unjustified due to interpretational disputes. The appellant's arguments supported by a Chartered Engineer's certificate and previous case law played a crucial role in the decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336573