<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1217 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336572</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit could not be denied where duty-paid inputs moved directly from the manufacturer to the user under the manufacturer&#039;s invoice through an intermediate buyer, because the invoice remained a valid duty-paying document and no separate invoice was required for transit sale. The circular also clarified that persons involved in such transit sale need not obtain registration. Since the appellant received the inputs and supporting documents and used them in manufacture, minor procedural defects or the intermediary&#039;s lack of registration did not defeat credit; denial of Cenvat credit was therefore unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2016 07:54:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1217 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336572</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit could not be denied where duty-paid inputs moved directly from the manufacturer to the user under the manufacturer&#039;s invoice through an intermediate buyer, because the invoice remained a valid duty-paying document and no separate invoice was required for transit sale. The circular also clarified that persons involved in such transit sale need not obtain registration. Since the appellant received the inputs and supporting documents and used them in manufacture, minor procedural defects or the intermediary&#039;s lack of registration did not defeat credit; denial of Cenvat credit was therefore unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>