<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1217 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336572</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant the right to claim cenvat credit despite the involvement of an intermediate buyer in the transaction. The decision emphasized adherence to prescribed procedures and recognized that minor procedural discrepancies should not hinder a manufacturer&#039;s entitlement to credit for duty paid inputs used in manufacturing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2016 07:54:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1217 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336572</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant the right to claim cenvat credit despite the involvement of an intermediate buyer in the transaction. The decision emphasized adherence to prescribed procedures and recognized that minor procedural discrepancies should not hinder a manufacturer&#039;s entitlement to credit for duty paid inputs used in manufacturing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>