https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336568 The Tribunal upheld the imposition of an equivalent penalty on the appellant for Central Excise violations, emphasizing compliance with procedures. The appellant's challenge regarding the admissibility of CENVAT Credit for certain inputs was rejected due to a lack of evidence linking inputs to exported goods. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of self-assessment and Department audits. The appellant was granted the option of a reduced penalty under Section 11AC, provided it is paid within one month. The appeal succeeded only in securing this reduced penalty option. en-us Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336568 The Tribunal upheld the imposition of an equivalent penalty on the appellant for Central Excise violations, emphasizing compliance with procedures. The appellant's challenge regarding the admissibility of CENVAT Credit for certain inputs was rejected due to a lack of evidence linking inputs to exported goods. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of self-assessment and Department audits. The appellant was granted the option of a reduced penalty under Section 11AC, provided it is paid within one month. The appeal succeeded only in securing this reduced penalty option. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336568