https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336567 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal challenging the appellant's claim of 10% mill scale generation, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence to dispute it. The decision underscored the necessity of factual evidence over assumptions, concluding that the appellant's justification was valid due to the absence of scientific data supporting the Revenue's position. The Tribunal upheld the initial authority's ruling, highlighting the Revenue's failure to prove clandestine activities based solely on presumptions, ultimately affirming the appellant's claim. en-us Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336567 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal challenging the appellant's claim of 10% mill scale generation, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence to dispute it. The decision underscored the necessity of factual evidence over assumptions, concluding that the appellant's justification was valid due to the absence of scientific data supporting the Revenue's position. The Tribunal upheld the initial authority's ruling, highlighting the Revenue's failure to prove clandestine activities based solely on presumptions, ultimately affirming the appellant's claim. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336567