https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336564 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case for further adjudication within three months. Despite Rule 7's inapplicability to the import in 1990, the appellant was directed to submit documents proving the capital goods' use for the project, as required by the bond's conditions under Project Import Regulations. The decision emphasized the necessity of demonstrating compliance with the regulations, granting the appellant an opportunity to furnish the essential documentation for project fulfillment. en-us Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Feb 2017 12:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336564 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case for further adjudication within three months. Despite Rule 7's inapplicability to the import in 1990, the appellant was directed to submit documents proving the capital goods' use for the project, as required by the bond's conditions under Project Import Regulations. The decision emphasized the necessity of demonstrating compliance with the regulations, granting the appellant an opportunity to furnish the essential documentation for project fulfillment. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336564