<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (3) TMI 112 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189004</link>
    <description>An appellate authority constituted under a State statute and functionally operating within the State for disposal of statutory appeals may fall within the High Court&#039;s territorial jurisdiction under Article 226, even if its office is outside the State. The earlier cases on location and merger were distinguished on their facts, and the writ could therefore be entertained. The evacuee share in the partnership was held to have vested automatically in the Custodian by operation of evacuee-property law, so the later saving and deeming provisions did not require a fresh notice or declaration once the earlier finding had become final.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 11:39:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (3) TMI 112 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189004</link>
      <description>An appellate authority constituted under a State statute and functionally operating within the State for disposal of statutory appeals may fall within the High Court&#039;s territorial jurisdiction under Article 226, even if its office is outside the State. The earlier cases on location and merger were distinguished on their facts, and the writ could therefore be entertained. The evacuee share in the partnership was held to have vested automatically in the Custodian by operation of evacuee-property law, so the later saving and deeming provisions did not require a fresh notice or declaration once the earlier finding had become final.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>