<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1199 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336554</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the petition, quashing the order directing the petitioner to deposit 15% of the demand. The Court directed the CIT [A] to decide the appeal in accordance with the law and on merits, with a stay on the total demand as per the original assessment orders during the pendency and final disposal of the appeals. The rule nisi was made absolute to this extent, with no costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 11:17:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1199 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336554</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the petition, quashing the order directing the petitioner to deposit 15% of the demand. The Court directed the CIT [A] to decide the appeal in accordance with the law and on merits, with a stay on the total demand as per the original assessment orders during the pendency and final disposal of the appeals. The rule nisi was made absolute to this extent, with no costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>