https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336548 The court upheld the validity of the notice demanding payment post-assessment, property attachment, and publication in newspapers for auction. It ruled that publication in three dailies, including two vernacular and one English, was within the discretion of the Recovery Officer under Rule 54 of the Income Tax Act 1961. The petitioner was directed to pay the demanded amount within a week, with attachment to be lifted upon payment. The Department was instructed to notify the Sub Registrar upon attachment vacation. The writ petition was disposed of in favor of the respondents. en-us Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Dec 2016 22:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336548 The court upheld the validity of the notice demanding payment post-assessment, property attachment, and publication in newspapers for auction. It ruled that publication in three dailies, including two vernacular and one English, was within the discretion of the Recovery Officer under Rule 54 of the Income Tax Act 1961. The petitioner was directed to pay the demanded amount within a week, with attachment to be lifted upon payment. The Department was instructed to notify the Sub Registrar upon attachment vacation. The writ petition was disposed of in favor of the respondents. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336548