<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1191 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336546</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that interest income from fixed deposits could not be included in the profit and gains of the business undertaking for the purpose of claiming deduction u/s.10A of the Act. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of a direct nexus between the interest income and the activities of the eligible undertaking, ultimately denying the inclusion of such income for the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 11:17:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1191 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336546</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that interest income from fixed deposits could not be included in the profit and gains of the business undertaking for the purpose of claiming deduction u/s.10A of the Act. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of a direct nexus between the interest income and the activities of the eligible undertaking, ultimately denying the inclusion of such income for the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>