<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1187 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336542</link>
    <description>The ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal filed against the CIT(A) order for AY 2009-10. The ITAT directed the CIT(A) to verify if the seized cash was adequate to cover the tax liability and disagreed with the dismissal of the appeal without considering the merits. The appeal was admitted for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of addressing the legal issues raised and providing a fresh adjudication opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 21:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1187 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336542</link>
      <description>The ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal filed against the CIT(A) order for AY 2009-10. The ITAT directed the CIT(A) to verify if the seized cash was adequate to cover the tax liability and disagreed with the dismissal of the appeal without considering the merits. The appeal was admitted for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of addressing the legal issues raised and providing a fresh adjudication opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>