<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1185 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336540</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ordering the deletion of the penalty of Rs. 1,13,430 levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee had disclosed all relevant particulars, and there was no case of furnishing inaccurate income details. The penalty was deemed unjustified, leading to its removal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 11:16:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1185 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336540</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ordering the deletion of the penalty of Rs. 1,13,430 levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee had disclosed all relevant particulars, and there was no case of furnishing inaccurate income details. The penalty was deemed unjustified, leading to its removal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>