https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336534 The appellate tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), Ranchi, denying the appellant's claim for Cenvat Credit of Rs. 4,63,489.56 for services received before 10/9/2004, citing inadmissibility under Rule 3(1)(xi) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant's failure to cooperate with authorities by not providing necessary documents, despite repeated requests, led to the dismissal of the appeal. The tribunal concluded that the appellant's actions indicated a lack of intention to prove innocence and suggested a potential attempt to conceal illegal availment of CENVAT Credit. en-us Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Dec 2016 11:16:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336534 The appellate tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), Ranchi, denying the appellant's claim for Cenvat Credit of Rs. 4,63,489.56 for services received before 10/9/2004, citing inadmissibility under Rule 3(1)(xi) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant's failure to cooperate with authorities by not providing necessary documents, despite repeated requests, led to the dismissal of the appeal. The tribunal concluded that the appellant's actions indicated a lack of intention to prove innocence and suggested a potential attempt to conceal illegal availment of CENVAT Credit. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336534