https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336533 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the Adjudicating authority for further proceedings. The authority was directed to reconsider the rejection of the remission application in light of the insurance claim filed by the appellant to determine if the excise duty element was excluded from the compensation paid. The appellant was granted a personal hearing to present relevant insurance claim papers to establish that excise duty on the destroyed goods had not been compensated. The decision aimed at ensuring a fair consideration of the remission application. en-us Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Feb 2018 11:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336533 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the Adjudicating authority for further proceedings. The authority was directed to reconsider the rejection of the remission application in light of the insurance claim filed by the appellant to determine if the excise duty element was excluded from the compensation paid. The appellant was granted a personal hearing to present relevant insurance claim papers to establish that excise duty on the destroyed goods had not been compensated. The decision aimed at ensuring a fair consideration of the remission application. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336533