<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1172 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336527</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Original Authority for reevaluation of the classification of Rubber Sheets under Tariff Item No. 40082110 vs. 40082910. The Tribunal highlighted discrepancies in test reports and emphasized the appellants&#039; right to cross-examination, which was denied initially. The decision underscored the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice for a fair adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1172 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336527</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Original Authority for reevaluation of the classification of Rubber Sheets under Tariff Item No. 40082110 vs. 40082910. The Tribunal highlighted discrepancies in test reports and emphasized the appellants&#039; right to cross-examination, which was denied initially. The decision underscored the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice for a fair adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>